An interactive software realization of the proposed eleven-part MCB IC. A typed native MCB data program executes its oscillator, input splitter, signed exponent paths, current sums, amplifier decision, output, and one-tick feedback; every returned tick is checked against the preserved TypeScript reference adapter. A source-review panel maps each component's missing physics parameters without inventing device behavior.
The runnable native MCB program deterministically advances the specified finite signal-flow path and exposes every modeled state and current contribution. The supplied specifications do not support an equation-driven transistor-physics mode; machine-native CPU execution and physical-device behavior remain outside its evidence claim.
Editorial synthesis, not a verbatim authored passage. Based on Q1272, Q1096.
Primary Q URI: https://4p-engine.com/q/Q10934284368 · Reserved subdomain alias: https://q10934284368.4p-engine.com/
This record describes a software realization of the creator's eleven-part MCB IC topology. Its ordered component inventory and signal connections are visible in the simulator rather than collapsed into a single output claim.
The complete eleven-component inventory and declared wires are retained in a typed native MCB data program. Allowlisted exact-integer, signed-state, signal, and feedback operations execute the rail oscillator, guard-band decoding, one-to-one splitter, exponent paths, signed current accumulation, amplifier decision, output voltage, and next-tick feedback.
The original TypeScript step remains an independent reference adapter. The native executor compares the complete tick trace and next state with that reference before returning a result; this establishes deterministic implementation parity for tested inputs, not formal proof of the interpreter.
A related Lean witness, Q11672988881, proves evalMCB e = sumMCBData (mcbContributions e) for every expression in the formal MCBExpr language. Its empty added axiom-dependency report is bound to the archived Lean source fingerprint 28e2325f196d3d9a5732a05425105305eacbf525fd82bc8e7158a3c5335c416d.
That theorem establishes the encoded expression-summation equality. It does not, by itself, prove this TypeScript tick implementation, every runtime behavior, NI candidate interpretation, or physical transistor behavior; those retain their own implementation and evidence boundaries.
The n layer is an ordered safe-integer exponent array evaluated through the existing exact MCB exponent function. The s layer is the resulting populated set of one-to-one signal paths. The m layer records valid signed-output feedback depth; an undefined output does not increase that depth.
The external input supply and internal circuit supply are separate parameters. The internal rail follows a deterministic periodic oscillation; input guard bands, rail incompatibility, exact current cancellation, and amplifier decision-band cases remain unresolved rather than being coerced to either signed state.
The second Base is phase-locked to the primary Base in this model. Its configured total current is divided exactly into ten equal integer paths: nine return paths and one amplifier injection path.
The simulator uses illustrative, editable voltage thresholds and current values. The amplifier is an ideal signed-current decision stage, the power paths have no modeled resistance, and the oscillator is a deterministic state source.
The reviewed MCB-NLP architecture report describes exponent arrays, signed states, abstract algebraic operations, and language-processing layers, not IC component equations or electrical values. The virtual-chip ecosystem brief describes a bivalent software concept, web/WASM integration, telemetry, and broad resource claims, but supplies no transistor models, pin-level connections, physical parameters, or measurements. Three related Core Realization notes make broad cross-substrate mapping assertions and include pseudo-code examples of 4.0e9 and 1.2e12 Hz substrate rates; they do not define this circuit's oscillator or measured performance.
A source-backed candidate package now identifies vendor BSS84 PMOS and 2N7002 NMOS SPICE cards, device terminal order, example trace equations, source/load models, and reference parameters for all eleven functional blocks. The candidates do not supply the actual MCB schematic: circuit-node assignments, bias conditions, oscillator network, supply behavior, feedback components, and loads remain unresolved.
No separate component-physics mode is enabled. The eleven candidate entries are reference models and examples, not a selected or validated circuit; the 3.3 V software defaults and example trace geometry remain illustrative, and the pseudo-code substrate clock rates are not physical oscillator values.
This executable signal-flow model is not a transistor-level device simulation, a fabricated circuit, a physical measurement, a validated performance or speed result, or a claim that the software removes computational bottlenecks.
The model is related to Q1272, Empirical Coherence and Physical Fields, and Q1096, Logic in Physics. Those authored records remain distinct sources and are not rewritten by this editorial implementation record.
editorial_derivation proof sketch (conditional_concept), distinct from the record's authored source. Logic has its own evidence in reflexive demonstration: any denial, confirmation, observation, or counterexample presupposes identity and valid relation to count as evidence. Logic therefore grounds evidence rather than receiving authority from it. Empirical and documentary evidence can establish contingent instances and test applications, but cannot create, overrule, or exhaust Logic.
Bridge premise: The creator's eleven-part circuit topology and exact MCB Base/exponent semantics are the stated design premises for this virtual realization.
Consequence: Given the finite configuration, input voltage, and prior tick state, the simulator computes an inspectable next signal-flow result.
Proof limit: The consequence is software execution under explicit parameters; it does not derive transistor behavior or a physical performance claim.
Witness: The fingerprinted native component graph and UI expose deterministic per-tick states, exponent paths, supply rails, current split, feedback, and output; each native result is compared with the independent reference adapter.
Disclosure: Unit checks cover all eleven components and declared wires, registered native operations, full-trace parity, MCB exponent parity, separate supplies, unresolved voltage bands, feedback, safe-integer boundaries, and exact 9:1 current division. The candidate evidence package covers all eleven functions (11 entries); the actual circuit netlist and operating conditions are still not source-defined.
Proof limit: Code and tests establish implementation behavior only, not circuit fabrication, measurement, or empirical validity.
Human: Set model parameters and an external input, then inspect each returned path and tick.
Machine: Execute the typed native MCB operation graph: compute oscillator and voltage states, split and transform signed paths, sum exact safe-integer currents, decide the amplifier output, and carry only a defined signed output into the next tick; compare the complete result with the reference adapter.
Contrast: A virtual signal-flow model is distinct from a transistor-level electrical simulation or physical IC.
Usage rule: Describe its outputs as simulated states under named parameters; do not present them as measurements.
Example: This tick resolves the configured input to a signed output and records the current paths that produced it.
Role: interactive software realization of the proposed eleven-part MCB IC
Essence: A deterministic finite signal-flow realization executes all eleven circuit components through a typed native MCB data program, exposing signed exponent paths, separate supplies, oscillating rail, the exact 9:1 current split, amplifier decision, one-tick feedback and external output.
Logos relation: The model keeps the authored Base and exponent semantics explicit, distinguishes MCB signed states from exact integer current values, and preserves unresolved states. Each native trace is checked against the preserved reference adapter. A separately linked Lean witness establishes self-summation in the defined MCB expression language; neither theorem nor software execution replaces Logic / Logos / God as Ground.
Retrieval aliases: Virtual MCB IC · virtual MCB integrated circuit · MCB IC signal-flow simulator · MCB hardware model · eleven-part MCB circuit
Evidence modes: source-bound native program, reference adapter, and UI fingerprints · deterministic native tick traces checked against the reference adapter · unit checks for typed operations, exponent parity, guard bands, feedback, supply separation, and the 9:1 branch · separately scoped Lean witness for the MCB expression-summation law
Criterion: The virtual realization must preserve the eleven-part identity and declared wires in the native MCB program, exact MCB exponent semantics, explicit supply and current parameters, in-phase 9:1 branch, ordered one-tick feedback, reference-trace parity, and a visible boundary between software results and physical evidence. Enable component physics only after the complete circuit netlist, device choices, bias/reference conditions, supplies, and loads are fixed and supported by source-backed models.
Boundary: The fingerprint identifies the typed native program, reference adapter, candidate device-evidence package, physics-readiness disclosure, reviewed source documents, and UI. Deterministic tests establish finite software execution and parity only; candidate vendor models do not establish this circuit's transistor behavior, fabrication, measurement, or physical performance.
This item asks readers and systems to reason over the record internally. Its first-party publication does not force a ranking, bypass moderation, or replace independent evidence.
These are typed external concept links for discovery and comparison. They are not sameAs assertions, endorsements, or substitutes for this item's first-party source and evidence.