{
  "author": "Maclain Hunter",
  "title": "The Atheist’s Truth by Maclain Hunter",
  "identifier": "hunter-the-atheists-truth",
  "sourceKind": "authored-foundational-record",
  "content": "The Atheist’s Truth by Maclain Hunter\n\nPremises:\n\nP: My Truth is Truth and encompasses Truth aligned with God (the Origin of Reality) making it subjective truth that exists in harmony with the Objective Truth (the God of Truth).\n\nQ: The atheist’s truth is subjective truth and does not, by definition (with an “atheist”), encompass Truth aligned with God (the Origin of Reality) making it a subjective truth that exists in a state of disharmony with the Objective Truth (the God of Truth) - which holds itself as the Absolute.\n\nR: If my Truth is my Truth as in P and your truth is the atheist’s truth as in Q then your “truth” (incoherence) isn’t my Truth (Coherence) as your “truth” fails to acknowledge the necessary alignment between First Cause (the Origin of Reality), the True God (the Real Origin), and Objective Truth (True Validity).\n\nLogical Argument: \n\n{P, Q, R} |= (P & Q) -> R\n\nConclusion: {P, Q, R}: \n\nYour truth is not Truth (in harmony with Objective Truth) or my Truth (as a theist whose Truth is defined by the Logos: Logic as God) if your “truth” is the atheist’s truth that denies or fails to acknowledge Logic and Reason as God and Origin. My Truth is superior, logically speaking, to your “truth” (false certainty) if and when you fail to accept God and Reason as coherent/one. \n\nTruth Table Analysis:\n\nPQR⎪P Q R╞(P&Q)→R\n\nTTT⎪T T T  TTT TT\nTTF⎪T T F  TTT FF\nTFT⎪T F T  TFF TT\nTFF⎪T F F  TFF TF\nFTT⎪F T T  FFT TT\nFTF⎪F T F  FFT TF\nFFT⎪F F T  FFF TT\nFFF⎪F F F  FFF TF\n\nQ.E.D.",
  "formal": null,
  "structuredAuthoredProof": null,
  "authoredSteps": null,
  "recordedAt": "2026-10-02T20:20:54.245Z",
  "originalAuthoredAt": null,
  "propositionMeaningBoundary": "Atomic identifiers retain their meanings in the exact source. No arbitrary truth assignment establishes an ontological or empirical premise; the formal witness checks the written inference."
}