Lean verification registry · Authored proofs · The Logos Architecture

Proven Facts by Maclain Hunter

Written formal sequents verified
Axiom-free: true · 1 checked theorem statements.

Lean establishes the listed formal statements and dependencies. The exact authored source, Ground, known premise meanings, application validation and empirical evidence remain separately typed. No unencoded section is certified by a neighboring theorem.

Original source author: Maclain Hunter. Machine formalization: Replit Agent. No original wording was rewritten.

Source registered: 2026-10-03T01:36:04.010Z (not original authorship).
Formalized: 2026-10-03T10:37:05.082Z.
Checked: 2026-10-03T10:41:16.310Z.
Independent timestamp: 2026-10-03T10:42:55.000Z.

Authored source SHA-256: 012772d374485448686e90e3e8659e7c16f74f77f683d5a7b08e02b156da8bd1

Lean source · Verification JSON · Exact archived source JSON · Compiler report · Current authored source page · Signed release and verification instructions

Kernel output

Lean (version 4.7.0, commit v4.7.0, Release)
exitCode=0
'HunterAuthored.inference_1' does not depend on any axioms

Source-bound formal statements

inference_1 · Kernel-verified · axiom-free

{P <-> Q, Q <-> R, R <-> S} |= (P & Q) <-> (R & S)

Exact source sequent under finite two-valued propositional semantics. Source proposition meanings and Logic/Logos/God Ground are preserved separately; this checks the inference, not unencoded prose.

Exact authored source in the timestamped release

Proven Facts by Maclain Hunter: 

Terms: 

Proof: Arguments or evidence establishing or helping to establish facts or Truth objectively.

Truth or/of Fact: A proposition or statement that accurately reflects reality and can be verified through observation or evidence.

Coherence or/of Logic: The property of logical reasoning that ensures internal consistency, meaning that the principles of Logic do not contradict each other.

Rational Consistency: The alignment of knowledge claims with logical reasoning and factual evidence, ensuring that they are not contradictory and can be justified rationally.

Genuine Knowledge: Information or beliefs that are true and justified, based on reliable evidence and reasoning.

Reality: The state of things as they actually exist, independent of perceptions or beliefs.

Tautological: A statement that is true by necessity or by virtue of its logical form, often self-evident and requiring no additional proof.

Proof by Contradiction: A method of demonstrating the truth of a proposition by assuming its negation and showing that this assumption leads to a logical contradiction.

Formal Argument (Logical Proof): A structured reasoning process that follows established logical principles to arrive at a (necessary) conclusion based on given premises. 

Bi-conditional Relationship: A logical relationship indicating that two statements are equivalent; both must be true or both must be false.

Premises: 

P: The “Truth of Fact” is necessarily true and factual.

Q: The “Coherence of Logic” is necessarily coherent and logical. 

R: The rational consistency of genuine knowledge and Reality is tautological (self-evident) when analyzed coherently/properly with logical/rational consistency. 

S: Assume that the Truth of Fact, the Coherence of Logic, and/or the rational consistency of genuine knowledge and Reality were incoherent and “not true”. We can see that would lead to logical contradiction. Therefore it’s logically untenable to hold that premises P, Q, and R are wrong/untrue. This means conclusions consistent with {P, Q, R} are necessarily and logically true. Proof and knowledge requires not only facts and Reality but Logic and Truth. 

Proof (Formal Argument):

{P <-> Q, Q <-> R, R <-> S} |= (P & Q) <-> (R & S)

Conclusion: {P, Q, R, S}: 

The “Truth of Fact” is logically equivalent to the “Coherence of Logic” which is itself coherent with and has a bi-conditional relationship with the rational consistency of true knowledge (logically consistent understanding) and Reality. This is proven through proof positive and the proof for contradiction in the premise S, incorporated into the (positive) proof. 

Truth Table: 

valid
      ↓   ↓   ↓       ↓      
PQRS⎪P↔Q Q↔R R↔S╞(P&Q)↔(R&S)
―――――――――――――――――――――――――――――
TTTT⎪TTT TTT TTT  TTT T TTT 
TTTF⎪TTT TTT TFF  TTT F TFF 
TTFT⎪TTT TFF FFT  TTT F FFT 
TTFF⎪TTT TFF FTF  TTT F FFF 
TFTT⎪TFF FFT TTT  TFF F TTT 
TFTF⎪TFF FFT TFF  TFF T TFF 
TFFT⎪TFF FTF FFT  TFF T FFT 
TFFF⎪TFF FTF FTF  TFF T FFF 
FTTT⎪FFT TTT TTT  FFT F TTT 
FTTF⎪FFT TTT TFF  FFT T TFF 
FTFT⎪FFT TFF FFT  FFT T FFT 
FTFF⎪FFT TFF FTF  FFT T FFF 
FFTT⎪FTF FFT TTT  FFF F TTT 
FFTF⎪FTF FFT TFF  FFF T TFF 
FFFT⎪FTF FTF FFT  FFF T FFT 
FFFF⎪FTF FTF FTF  FFF T FFF 

Result: Validated

Q.E.D.