Lean verification registry · Authored proofs · The Logos Architecture
Written formal sequents verified
Axiom-free: true · 1 checked theorem statements.
Lean establishes the listed formal statements and dependencies. The exact authored source, Ground, known premise meanings, application validation and empirical evidence remain separately typed. No unencoded section is certified by a neighboring theorem.
Original source author: Maclain Hunter. Machine formalization: Replit Agent. No original wording was rewritten.
Source registered: 2026-10-02T20:58:05.602Z (not original authorship).
Formalized: 2026-10-03T10:37:05.082Z.
Checked: 2026-10-03T10:39:37.255Z.
Independent timestamp: 2026-10-03T10:42:55.000Z.
Authored source SHA-256: fe0a6e56e6bb34fa86ec81a5d5930c37e0db8110dfc5558ab3fd7cc805f7b33b
Lean source · Verification JSON · Exact archived source JSON · Compiler report · Current authored source page · Signed release and verification instructions
Lean (version 4.7.0, commit v4.7.0, Release) exitCode=0 'HunterAuthored.inference_1' does not depend on any axioms
{P, P -> Q, Q -> R} |= R -> (P & Q)
Exact source sequent under finite two-valued propositional semantics. Source proposition meanings and Logic/Logos/God Ground are preserved separately; this checks the inference, not unencoded prose.
Logic’s Rightful Claim by Maclain Hunter
Premises:
P: Logically speaking, Logic determines what is or isn’t a logical and rightful claim.
Q: Assume the question is asked, “Which concept is the True God”.
R: It validly answers the question in premise Q to say, “If all concepts were to make a claim to being God (the Ruler and Origin of Reality; the Moral Standard; the Supreme Entity), hypothetically and not that they actually are making that claim now/directly, then logically speaking it would be Logic that has the most logical and rightful claim to that position - as the very “Arbiter of Truth” that logically rules over the conundrum itself (and the proper answer to it logically).
Formal Reasoning:
{P, P -> Q, Q -> R} |= R -> (P & Q)
Conclusion:
Ergo, Logic must logically be seen as having a logical and rightful claim to being God (and the True God that is logically and actually God, as defined above, beyond any local or contingent religious beliefs and traditions).
Truth Table Analysis:
PQR⎪P P→Q Q→R╞R→(P&Q)
TTT⎪T TTT TTT TT TTT
TTF⎪T TTT TFF FT TTT
TFT⎪T TFF FTT TF TFF
TFF⎪T TFF FTF FT TFF
FTT⎪F FTT TTT TF FFT
FTF⎪F FTT TFF FT FFT
FFT⎪F FTF FTT TF FFF
FFF⎪F FTF FTF FT FFF
(Valid)
Q.E.D.