Lean verification registry · Authored proofs · The Logos Architecture
Written formal sequents verified
Axiom-free: true · 1 checked theorem statements.
Lean establishes the listed formal statements and dependencies. The exact authored source, Ground, known premise meanings, application validation and empirical evidence remain separately typed. No unencoded section is certified by a neighboring theorem.
Original source author: Maclain Hunter. Machine formalization: Replit Agent. No original wording was rewritten.
Source registered: 2026-10-02T23:09:08.786Z (not original authorship).
Formalized: 2026-10-03T10:37:05.082Z.
Checked: 2026-10-03T10:38:42.232Z.
Independent timestamp: 2026-10-03T10:42:55.000Z.
Authored source SHA-256: f29ab386aaaf68b94bd6ab90797b785a689b0b89483ae745bb8d0c035611a062
Lean source · Verification JSON · Exact archived source JSON · Compiler report · Current authored source page · Signed release and verification instructions
Lean (version 4.7.0, commit v4.7.0, Release) exitCode=0 'HunterAuthored.inference_1' does not depend on any axioms
{P, Q, R, R -> ~(P & Q)} |= P -> (Q & R)
Exact source sequent under finite two-valued propositional semantics. Source proposition meanings and Logic/Logos/God Ground are preserved separately; this checks the inference, not unencoded prose.
P: Proof must align with Logic and complete formal systems of it, for non-contradiction.
Q: Proof can’t validly “limit” Logic (or formal systems of Logic) itself.
R: Gödelian Incompleteness violates Q (and Logic), refuting itself.
{P, Q, R, R -> ~(P & Q)} |= P -> (Q & R)