{
  "author": "Maclain Hunter",
  "title": "Proof of Established Certainty by Maclain Hunter",
  "identifier": "hunter-established-certainty",
  "sourceKind": "authored-foundational-record",
  "content": "Proof of Established Certainty by Maclain Hunter\n\nPremises: \n\nP: Truth can be demonstrated with 100% certainty (rationally) though deductive logical proof. This can be represented by DT (standing for “Deductive Truth”)\n\nQ: In the context I am sharing this proof I have shown deductive logical proof to support my claims, thus I can be 100% certain. If the context changes then the level of certainty may change but where proof is present my certainty is complete. This can be encoded as PS (ie - proof shown).\n\nR: If A) I were uncertain then B) would contradict my certainty expressed confidently here in written (even “empirically observable”) form. This can be encoded as EOC (ie - empirically observable certainty).\n\nS: Since proof supports my rational certainty it is not blind acceptance, it is rationally justified. For my level of certainty to change it would take superior logical proof (SP) that refutes and/or logically supersedes the proof(s) at hand - not merely assertions or disbelief without superseding proof and Coherence. This can be encoded as PRN (ie - proper refutation necessary).\n\nT: The premises {P, Q, R, S} and the symbolic representations encoded within them have relationship that include the expression: \n\n{PS, PS -> DT, DT & EOC, PS -> PRN} |= ((DT & EOC) -> PRN) <-> PS\n\nFormal Reasoning: \n\n{P, P -> Q, Q & R, P -> S} |= ((P & Q) -> R) <-> S \n\nTruth Table Analysis:\n\nPQRS⎪P P→Q Q&R P→S╞((Q&R)→S)↔P\n\nTTTT⎪T TT TT TT   TT T T\nTTTF⎪T TT TT TF   TT F T\nTTFT⎪T TT TF TT   TF T T\nTTFF⎪T TT TF TF   TF F T\nTFTT⎪T TF FT TT   FT T T\nTFTF⎪T TF FT TF   FT F T\nTFFT⎪T TF FF TT   FF T T\nTFFF⎪T TF FF TF   FF F T\nFTTT⎪F FT TT FT   TT T F\nFTTF⎪F FT TT FF   TT F F\nFTFT⎪F FT TF FT   TF T F\nFTFF⎪F FT TF FF   TF F F\nFFTT⎪F FF FT FT   FT T F\nFFTF⎪F FF FT FF   FT F F\nFFFT⎪F FF FF FT   FF T F\nFFFF⎪F FF FF FF   FF F F\n\n(Valid) \n\nQ.E.D.",
  "formal": null,
  "structuredAuthoredProof": null,
  "authoredSteps": null,
  "recordedAt": "2026-10-02T21:46:58.577Z",
  "originalAuthoredAt": null,
  "propositionMeaningBoundary": "Atomic identifiers retain their meanings in the exact source. No arbitrary truth assignment establishes an ontological or empirical premise; the formal witness checks the written inference."
}